The blogger outlined the main pros and cons of this popular crossover.
Trying to figure out what a Renault Kaptur is better or worse than its competitors, a motorist with a channel devoted to test drives of new cars made up a list of five advantages and disadvantages of the French bestseller, which in the domestic market it enjoys no less demand than the brand new “lasso”. Obzorschik decided to start with what good “Captur” in the configuration for 1.25 million rubles.
First and foremost, the driver notes the smoothness of the car. Suspension is surprisingly energy-intensive, although in the past the driver always seemed that she’s worse than Renault Duster. A comfortable fit, like the machine for the money, it also plays an important role, and here Kaptur also gets a solid five from obzorschika. With a good geometrical passableness, the crossover provides excellent off-road capability, in this respect, though he is worse than the “Duster”, but the gap between them is not exactly critical.
A large trunk on 427 litres – pretty good for a subcompact, but in terms of price and equipment, I am convinced blogger, he is probably the best in the class. But there are plenty of moments in which Renault Kaptur openly failed, and obzorschik believes that they are even slightly outweigh all the positive traits mentioned earlier.
Too weak acceleration, the CVT overheat often, the stopping distance is 42 meters while trying to stop from a speed of 100 km/h, and fuel consumption is too much “horse” is 16.9 liters per 100 km is too much even for a car on the test drive: “he was Too ambiguous. Estimates for different items range from a solid five to Cola.”