Trial by dirt: Military equipment and “major” SUVs compare in action

Испытание грязью: Военную технику и «мажорные» внедорожники сравнили в действии

Modern technology to the prestige SUVs from Mercedes, JEEP, Toyota, Renault, Nissan and other brands challenged the outdated “simplicity and reliability” military vehicles UAZ and GAZ, as well as critical conditions of permeability.

Popular video blogger Alex on the YouTube channel “the Channel does Not Stop” highlighted “hard fight”: the off-road equipment with increased throughput and reliability of Mercedes, JEEP Wrangler, Toyota Prada, Nissan, Renault Duster, UAZ and GAZ compared to “passport”, “appearance”, cost and prestige, but in reality – in the harsh conditions of this “mud of arable land”. Also the company “the monsters” and made the Chevrolet-Niva (withdrew early), Chinese SsangYong crossover.

During a bold and entertaining experiment, the author noted one drawback of the modified heavy military vehicles (referring to the “Ural” on the basis of Gas): “if it will stick, to pull her will be nothing”.

3-тонногоNissan Patrol flooding rascasse field has become a difficult and dangerous test – almost stuck. Classic Niva and UAZ “Patriot” showed good strength and permeability. “Wrangler” with road tires decided not to risk it, although he’s still stuck in the softened arable land. Volkswagen Amarok was the “obstacle”, but somehow “insecure”. The author was surprised that another “field” to “sossage” quite easily overcame the obstacle and not stuck in the mud. But the 5-liter “Helico” rascasse mud swamp was not easy, in contrast to the 4-litre Oise. GAS as the ambulance is “pulled” all, in fact “unaware” of a furnace is dirt.

Испытание грязью: Военную технику и «мажорные» внедорожники сравнили в действии

Испытание грязью: Военную технику и «мажорные» внедорожники сравнили в действии

Share